<?phpxml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>The Meetingpoint at Slavyanski.net / josephpastry / New</title>
<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020</link>
<description>Your Source for Social News and Networking</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 13:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
<language>en</language>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Sp70 (Fig. 26) and Hsp90 (Fig. 31) also contain several unique sequence signatures]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=sp70-fig-26-and-hsp90-fig-31-also-contain-several-unique-sequence-signatures-1</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=sp70-fig-26-and-hsp90-fig-31-also-contain-several-unique-sequence-signatures-1"><![CDATA[Sp70 (Fig. 26) and Hsp90 (Fig. 31) also contain several unique sequence signatures]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[Sp70 (Fig. 26) and Hsp90 (Fig. 31) also contain several unique sequence signatures not found in any prokaryotic homologs. These signature provides evidence that all of the eukaryotes are derived from a single ancestor and that the postulated fusion event was unique.VOL. 62,PHYLOGENY OF PROKARYOTES AND EUKARYOTEScluding amitochondriate and aplastidic cells, received major gene contributions to the  ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 13:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>josephpastry</author>
	<category></category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=sp70-fig-26-and-hsp90-fig-31-also-contain-several-unique-sequence-signatures-1</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Sp70 (Fig. 26) and Hsp90 (Fig. 31) also contain several unique sequence signatures]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=sp70-fig-26-and-hsp90-fig-31-also-contain-several-unique-sequence-signatures-5</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=sp70-fig-26-and-hsp90-fig-31-also-contain-several-unique-sequence-signatures-5"><![CDATA[Sp70 (Fig. 26) and Hsp90 (Fig. 31) also contain several unique sequence signatures]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[Sp70 (Fig. 26) and Hsp90 (Fig. 31) also contain several unique sequence signatures not found in any prokaryotic homologs. These signature provides evidence that all of the eukaryotes are derived from a single ancestor and that the postulated fusion event was unique.VOL. 62,PHYLOGENY OF PROKARYOTES AND EUKARYOTEScluding amitochondriate and aplastidic cells, received major gene contributions to the  ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 13:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>josephpastry</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=sp70-fig-26-and-hsp90-fig-31-also-contain-several-unique-sequence-signatures-5</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Distinction within prokaryotes, formingthe primary taxonomic division within them, which is]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=distinction-within-prokaryotes-formingthe-primary-taxonomic-division-within-them-which-is-2</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=distinction-within-prokaryotes-formingthe-primary-taxonomic-division-within-them-which-is-2"><![CDATA[Distinction within prokaryotes, formingthe primary taxonomic division within them, which is]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[Distinction within prokaryotes, formingthe primary taxonomic division within them, which is supported by both molecular sequence data and morphological features, is of the monoderm prokaryotes (Monodermata, i.e., those bounded by a single cell membrane) and the diderm prokaryotes (Didermata, i.e., those bounded by inner and outer cell membranes defining a periplasmic compartment). In that sense, b ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 21:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>josephpastry</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=distinction-within-prokaryotes-formingthe-primary-taxonomic-division-within-them-which-is-2</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Of a protein altered in mutants resistant to microtubule inhibitors as]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=of-a-protein-altered-in-mutants-resistant-to-microtubule-inhibitors-as-3</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=of-a-protein-altered-in-mutants-resistant-to-microtubule-inhibitors-as-3"><![CDATA[Of a protein altered in mutants resistant to microtubule inhibitors as]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[Of a protein altered in mutants resistant to microtubule inhibitors as a member of the major heat shock protein (hsp70) family. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:5160?5165. 3. Alberts, B., D. Bray, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Roberts, and J. D. Watson. 1994. Molecular biology of the cell. Garland Publishing, Inc., New York, N.Y. 4. Allsopp, A. 1969. Phylogenetic relationships of the procaryota and the origin of the e ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2020 14:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>josephpastry</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=of-a-protein-altered-in-mutants-resistant-to-microtubule-inhibitors-as-3</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Sp70 (Fig. 26) and Hsp90 (Fig. 31) also contain several unique sequence signatures]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=sp70-fig-26-and-hsp90-fig-31-also-contain-several-unique-sequence-signatures-7</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=sp70-fig-26-and-hsp90-fig-31-also-contain-several-unique-sequence-signatures-7"><![CDATA[Sp70 (Fig. 26) and Hsp90 (Fig. 31) also contain several unique sequence signatures]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[Sp70 (Fig. 26) and Hsp90 (Fig. 31) also contain several unique sequence signatures not found in any prokaryotic homologs. These signature provides evidence that all of the eukaryotes are derived from a single ancestor and that the postulated fusion event was unique.VOL. 62,PHYLOGENY OF PROKARYOTES AND EUKARYOTEScluding amitochondriate and aplastidic cells, received major gene contributions to the  ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2020 13:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>josephpastry</author>
	<category></category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=sp70-fig-26-and-hsp90-fig-31-also-contain-several-unique-sequence-signatures-7</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Sp70 (Fig. 26) and Hsp90 (Fig. 31) also contain several unique sequence signatures]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=sp70-fig-26-and-hsp90-fig-31-also-contain-several-unique-sequence-signatures-5</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=sp70-fig-26-and-hsp90-fig-31-also-contain-several-unique-sequence-signatures-5"><![CDATA[Sp70 (Fig. 26) and Hsp90 (Fig. 31) also contain several unique sequence signatures]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[Sp70 (Fig. 26) and Hsp90 (Fig. 31) also contain several unique sequence signatures not found in any prokaryotic homologs. These signature provides evidence that all of the eukaryotes are derived from a single ancestor and that the postulated fusion event was unique.VOL. 62,PHYLOGENY OF PROKARYOTES AND EUKARYOTEScluding amitochondriate and aplastidic cells, received major gene contributions to the  ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2020 13:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>josephpastry</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=sp70-fig-26-and-hsp90-fig-31-also-contain-several-unique-sequence-signatures-5</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Distinction within prokaryotes, formingthe primary taxonomic division within them, which is]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=distinction-within-prokaryotes-formingthe-primary-taxonomic-division-within-them-which-is-3</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=distinction-within-prokaryotes-formingthe-primary-taxonomic-division-within-them-which-is-3"><![CDATA[Distinction within prokaryotes, formingthe primary taxonomic division within them, which is]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[Distinction within prokaryotes, formingthe primary taxonomic division within them, which is supported by both molecular sequence data and morphological features, is of the monoderm prokaryotes (Monodermata, i.e., those bounded by a single cell membrane) and the diderm prokaryotes (Didermata, i.e., those bounded by inner and outer cell membranes defining a periplasmic compartment). In that sense, b ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 19:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>josephpastry</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=distinction-within-prokaryotes-formingthe-primary-taxonomic-division-within-them-which-is-3</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Karyotic cell nucleus and endomembrane system as per the chimeric model.]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=karyotic-cell-nucleus-and-endomembrane-system-as-per-the-chimeric-model--4</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=karyotic-cell-nucleus-and-endomembrane-system-as-per-the-chimeric-model--4"><![CDATA[Karyotic cell nucleus and endomembrane system as per the chimeric model.]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[Karyotic cell nucleus and endomembrane system as per the chimeric model. The key event in the origin of the eukaryotic cell is postulated to be a symbiotic association between a gram-negative eubacterium (from the proteobacteria-1 group) and likely an "eocyte" archaebacterium. This association led to the loss of the outer membrane from the gram-negative bacterium (not shown). As the membrane of th ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 18:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>josephpastry</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=karyotic-cell-nucleus-and-endomembrane-system-as-per-the-chimeric-model--4</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Oteobacteria). The evolutionary history deduced here based on signature sequences in]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=oteobacteria-the-evolutionary-history-deduced-here-based-on-signature-sequences-in-1</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=oteobacteria-the-evolutionary-history-deduced-here-based-on-signature-sequences-in-1"><![CDATA[Oteobacteria). The evolutionary history deduced here based on signature sequences in]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[Oteobacteria). The evolutionary history deduced here based on signature sequences in some of the most highly conserved protein sequences in the biota is in contrast to the rather confusing picture that seems to be emerging from other analyses of the completed bacterial genomes (21, 50, 68, 130, 143, 144, 182, 191, 255). However, as has been pointed out (50, 143, 144, 182), of the large number of s ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 18:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>josephpastry</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=oteobacteria-the-evolutionary-history-deduced-here-based-on-signature-sequences-in-1</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Oteobacteria). The evolutionary history deduced here based on signature sequences in]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=oteobacteria-the-evolutionary-history-deduced-here-based-on-signature-sequences-in-6</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=oteobacteria-the-evolutionary-history-deduced-here-based-on-signature-sequences-in-6"><![CDATA[Oteobacteria). The evolutionary history deduced here based on signature sequences in]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[Oteobacteria). The evolutionary history deduced here based on signature sequences in some of the most highly conserved protein sequences in the biota is in contrast to the rather confusing picture that seems to be emerging from other analyses of the completed bacterial genomes (21, 50, 68, 130, 143, 144, 182, 191, 255). However, as has been pointed out (50, 143, 144, 182), of the large number of s ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 18:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>josephpastry</author>
	<category></category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=oteobacteria-the-evolutionary-history-deduced-here-based-on-signature-sequences-in-6</guid>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
