<?phpxml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>The Meetingpoint at Slavyanski.net / tray9russia / New</title>
<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020</link>
<description>Your Source for Social News and Networking</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
<language>en</language>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Karyotic cell nucleus and endomembrane system as per the chimeric model.]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=karyotic-cell-nucleus-and-endomembrane-system-as-per-the-chimeric-model--3</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=karyotic-cell-nucleus-and-endomembrane-system-as-per-the-chimeric-model--3"><![CDATA[Karyotic cell nucleus and endomembrane system as per the chimeric model.]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[Karyotic cell nucleus and endomembrane system as per the chimeric model. The key event in the origin of the eukaryotic cell is postulated to be a symbiotic association between a gram-negative eubacterium (from the proteobacteria-1 group) and likely an "eocyte" archaebacterium. This association led to the loss of the outer membrane from the gram-negative bacterium (not shown). As the membrane of th ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>tray9russia</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=karyotic-cell-nucleus-and-endomembrane-system-as-per-the-chimeric-model--3</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[E signature sequences in different proteins support the division of Archaebacteria]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=e-signature-sequences-in-different-proteins-support-the-division-of-archaebacteria-9</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=e-signature-sequences-in-different-proteins-support-the-division-of-archaebacteria-9"><![CDATA[E signature sequences in different proteins support the division of Archaebacteria]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[E signature sequences in different proteins support the division of Archaebacteria into two distinct groups (Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota) and of gram-positive bacteria into at least two groups, corresponding to the low-G C and high-G C species, of which the high-G C group is specifically related to the diderm prokaryotes. The DeinococcusThermus group of species appears to be intermediate in th ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2020 10:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>tray9russia</author>
	<category></category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=e-signature-sequences-in-different-proteins-support-the-division-of-archaebacteria-9</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Distinction within prokaryotes, formingthe primary taxonomic division within them, which is]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=distinction-within-prokaryotes-formingthe-primary-taxonomic-division-within-them-which-is-7</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=distinction-within-prokaryotes-formingthe-primary-taxonomic-division-within-them-which-is-7"><![CDATA[Distinction within prokaryotes, formingthe primary taxonomic division within them, which is]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[Distinction within prokaryotes, formingthe primary taxonomic division within them, which is supported by both molecular sequence data and morphological features, is of the monoderm prokaryotes (Monodermata, i.e., those bounded by a single cell membrane) and the diderm prokaryotes (Didermata, i.e., those bounded by inner and outer cell membranes defining a periplasmic compartment). In that sense, b ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>tray9russia</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=distinction-within-prokaryotes-formingthe-primary-taxonomic-division-within-them-which-is-7</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Oteobacteria). The evolutionary history deduced here based on signature sequences in]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=oteobacteria-the-evolutionary-history-deduced-here-based-on-signature-sequences-in-3</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=oteobacteria-the-evolutionary-history-deduced-here-based-on-signature-sequences-in-3"><![CDATA[Oteobacteria). The evolutionary history deduced here based on signature sequences in]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[Oteobacteria). The evolutionary history deduced here based on signature sequences in some of the most highly conserved protein sequences in the biota is in contrast to the rather confusing picture that seems to be emerging from other analyses of the completed bacterial genomes (21, 50, 68, 130, 143, 144, 182, 191, 255). However, as has been pointed out (50, 143, 144, 182), of the large number of s ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>tray9russia</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=oteobacteria-the-evolutionary-history-deduced-here-based-on-signature-sequences-in-3</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Oteobacteria). The evolutionary history deduced here based on signature sequences in]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=oteobacteria-the-evolutionary-history-deduced-here-based-on-signature-sequences-in-6</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=oteobacteria-the-evolutionary-history-deduced-here-based-on-signature-sequences-in-6"><![CDATA[Oteobacteria). The evolutionary history deduced here based on signature sequences in]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[Oteobacteria). The evolutionary history deduced here based on signature sequences in some of the most highly conserved protein sequences in the biota is in contrast to the rather confusing picture that seems to be emerging from other analyses of the completed bacterial genomes (21, 50, 68, 130, 143, 144, 182, 191, 255). However, as has been pointed out (50, 143, 144, 182), of the large number of s ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>tray9russia</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=oteobacteria-the-evolutionary-history-deduced-here-based-on-signature-sequences-in-6</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Karyotic cell nucleus and endomembrane system as per the chimeric model.]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=karyotic-cell-nucleus-and-endomembrane-system-as-per-the-chimeric-model--8</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=karyotic-cell-nucleus-and-endomembrane-system-as-per-the-chimeric-model--8"><![CDATA[Karyotic cell nucleus and endomembrane system as per the chimeric model.]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[Karyotic cell nucleus and endomembrane system as per the chimeric model. The key event in the origin of the eukaryotic cell is postulated to be a symbiotic association between a gram-negative eubacterium (from the proteobacteria-1 group) and likely an "eocyte" archaebacterium. This association led to the loss of the outer membrane from the gram-negative bacterium (not shown). As the membrane of th ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>tray9russia</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=karyotic-cell-nucleus-and-endomembrane-system-as-per-the-chimeric-model--8</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Oteobacteria). The evolutionary history deduced here based on signature sequences in]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=oteobacteria-the-evolutionary-history-deduced-here-based-on-signature-sequences-in-5</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=oteobacteria-the-evolutionary-history-deduced-here-based-on-signature-sequences-in-5"><![CDATA[Oteobacteria). The evolutionary history deduced here based on signature sequences in]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[Oteobacteria). The evolutionary history deduced here based on signature sequences in some of the most highly conserved protein sequences in the biota is in contrast to the rather confusing picture that seems to be emerging from other analyses of the completed bacterial genomes (21, 50, 68, 130, 143, 144, 182, 191, 255). However, as has been pointed out (50, 143, 144, 182), of the large number of s ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 15:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>tray9russia</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=oteobacteria-the-evolutionary-history-deduced-here-based-on-signature-sequences-in-5</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[E signature sequences in different proteins support the division of Archaebacteria]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=e-signature-sequences-in-different-proteins-support-the-division-of-archaebacteria-9</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=e-signature-sequences-in-different-proteins-support-the-division-of-archaebacteria-9"><![CDATA[E signature sequences in different proteins support the division of Archaebacteria]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[E signature sequences in different proteins support the division of Archaebacteria into two distinct groups (Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota) and of gram-positive bacteria into at least two groups, corresponding to the low-G C and high-G C species, of which the high-G C group is specifically related to the diderm prokaryotes. The DeinococcusThermus group of species appears to be intermediate in th ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 07:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>tray9russia</author>
	<category></category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=e-signature-sequences-in-different-proteins-support-the-division-of-archaebacteria-9</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Ents was preceded or accompanied by duplication of the genes for]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=ents-was-preceded-or-accompanied-by-duplication-of-the-genes-for-2</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=ents-was-preceded-or-accompanied-by-duplication-of-the-genes-for-2"><![CDATA[Ents was preceded or accompanied by duplication of the genes for]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[Ents was preceded or accompanied by duplication of the genes for the chaperone proteins (Hsp70, Hsp90, DnaJ, etc.), which are necessary for protein transport and communication within the compartments. The transfer of the genome from the gram-negative eubacterium to the newly formed nucleus and an assortment and integration of genes from the two partners led to the formation of the ancestral eukary ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 07:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>tray9russia</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=ents-was-preceded-or-accompanied-by-duplication-of-the-genes-for-2</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[E signature sequences in different proteins support the division of Archaebacteria]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=e-signature-sequences-in-different-proteins-support-the-division-of-archaebacteria-1</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=e-signature-sequences-in-different-proteins-support-the-division-of-archaebacteria-1"><![CDATA[E signature sequences in different proteins support the division of Archaebacteria]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[E signature sequences in different proteins support the division of Archaebacteria into two distinct groups (Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota) and of gram-positive bacteria into at least two groups, corresponding to the low-G C and high-G C species, of which the high-G C group is specifically related to the diderm prokaryotes. The DeinococcusThermus group of species appears to be intermediate in th ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>tray9russia</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=e-signature-sequences-in-different-proteins-support-the-division-of-archaebacteria-1</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Distinction within prokaryotes, formingthe primary taxonomic division within them, which is]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=distinction-within-prokaryotes-formingthe-primary-taxonomic-division-within-them-which-is-6</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=distinction-within-prokaryotes-formingthe-primary-taxonomic-division-within-them-which-is-6"><![CDATA[Distinction within prokaryotes, formingthe primary taxonomic division within them, which is]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[Distinction within prokaryotes, formingthe primary taxonomic division within them, which is supported by both molecular sequence data and morphological features, is of the monoderm prokaryotes (Monodermata, i.e., those bounded by a single cell membrane) and the diderm prokaryotes (Didermata, i.e., those bounded by inner and outer cell membranes defining a periplasmic compartment). In that sense, b ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>tray9russia</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=distinction-within-prokaryotes-formingthe-primary-taxonomic-division-within-them-which-is-6</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[More susceptible to UTIs than are healthy patients because of the]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=more-susceptible-to-utis-than-are-healthy-patients-because-of-the-2</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=more-susceptible-to-utis-than-are-healthy-patients-because-of-the-2"><![CDATA[More susceptible to UTIs than are healthy patients because of the]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[More susceptible to UTIs than are healthy patients because of the greater adherence of type 1 fimbriated E. coli to bladder cells (57). The LGI network of Candida Als and Epa adhesins N-Als1p has been shown to interact with fucose-containing glycans that are present in blood group antigens and preferentially with antigen Htype 2 (22). Therefore, we performed glycan array screening to also determin ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>tray9russia</author>
	<category></category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=more-susceptible-to-utis-than-are-healthy-patients-because-of-the-2</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[More susceptible to UTIs than are healthy patients because of the]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=more-susceptible-to-utis-than-are-healthy-patients-because-of-the-4</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=more-susceptible-to-utis-than-are-healthy-patients-because-of-the-4"><![CDATA[More susceptible to UTIs than are healthy patients because of the]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[More susceptible to UTIs than are healthy patients because of the greater adherence of type 1 fimbriated E. coli to bladder cells (57). The LGI network of Candida Als and Epa adhesins N-Als1p has been shown to interact with fucose-containing glycans that are present in blood group antigens and preferentially with antigen Htype 2 (22). Therefore, we performed glycan array screening to also determin ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>tray9russia</author>
	<category></category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=more-susceptible-to-utis-than-are-healthy-patients-because-of-the-4</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[E signature sequences in different proteins support the division of Archaebacteria]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=e-signature-sequences-in-different-proteins-support-the-division-of-archaebacteria-5</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=e-signature-sequences-in-different-proteins-support-the-division-of-archaebacteria-5"><![CDATA[E signature sequences in different proteins support the division of Archaebacteria]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[E signature sequences in different proteins support the division of Archaebacteria into two distinct groups (Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota) and of gram-positive bacteria into at least two groups, corresponding to the low-G C and high-G C species, of which the high-G C group is specifically related to the diderm prokaryotes. The DeinococcusThermus group of species appears to be intermediate in th ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 05:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>tray9russia</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=e-signature-sequences-in-different-proteins-support-the-division-of-archaebacteria-5</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Karyotic cell nucleus and endomembrane system as per the chimeric model.]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=karyotic-cell-nucleus-and-endomembrane-system-as-per-the-chimeric-model--4</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=karyotic-cell-nucleus-and-endomembrane-system-as-per-the-chimeric-model--4"><![CDATA[Karyotic cell nucleus and endomembrane system as per the chimeric model.]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[Karyotic cell nucleus and endomembrane system as per the chimeric model. The key event in the origin of the eukaryotic cell is postulated to be a symbiotic association between a gram-negative eubacterium (from the proteobacteria-1 group) and likely an "eocyte" archaebacterium. This association led to the loss of the outer membrane from the gram-negative bacterium (not shown). As the membrane of th ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 04:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>tray9russia</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=karyotic-cell-nucleus-and-endomembrane-system-as-per-the-chimeric-model--4</guid>
</item>

<item>
	<title><![CDATA[E signature sequences in different proteins support the division of Archaebacteria]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=e-signature-sequences-in-different-proteins-support-the-division-of-archaebacteria</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=e-signature-sequences-in-different-proteins-support-the-division-of-archaebacteria"><![CDATA[E signature sequences in different proteins support the division of Archaebacteria]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[E signature sequences in different proteins support the division of Archaebacteria into two distinct groups (Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota) and of gram-positive bacteria into at least two groups, corresponding to the low-G C and high-G C species, of which the high-G C group is specifically related to the diderm prokaryotes. The DeinococcusThermus group of species appears to be intermediate in th ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 03:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>tray9russia</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=e-signature-sequences-in-different-proteins-support-the-division-of-archaebacteria</guid>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
